1. Beketova E.A., Kolesnikova V.O. Osobennosti samoocenki u ljudej, osushhestvljajushhih znakomstvo v internet-prostranstve i real'noj zhizni. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal prikladnyh i fundamental'nyh issledovanij. 2016. № 11 (chast' 4). P. 691–693. (In Russian)
2. Demenchuk A.V. Mobil'nye prilozhenija dlja znakomstv: transformacija intimnosti. Social'naja real'nost' virtual'nogo prostranstva. Materialy I Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. 20–23 sentjabrja 2019 g., Irkutsk. Eds. O.A. Poljushkevich, G.V. Druzhinin. Irkutsk: Izd-vo Irkutskij gosudarstvennyj universitet, 2019. P. 157–160. (In Russian)
3. Kashtanova O.V. Strategicheskie i takticheskie priemy brachnogo vybora. Azimut nauchnyh issledovanij: pedagogika i psihologija. 2017. V. 6. № 2 (19). P. 315–318. (In Russian)
4. Matanceva D.A. Stereotipy i narushenie social'nyh ritualov obshhenija na sajtah znakomstv (Badoo). Sociologicheskij narrativ 2020. Obshhestvo v jepohu turbulentnosti: poiski, ugrozy i perspektivy. Sbornik statej po materialam XIX Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferencii studentov i aspirantov. Ed. R.I. Anisimov. Moscow: Izd-vo Rossijskij gosudarstvennyj gumanitarnyj universitet, 2020. P. 214–223. (In Russian)
5. Matveenko V.V. Informacionno-kommunikacionnye tehnologii kak sociokul'turnaja praktika znakomstv. Monitoring obshhestvennogo mnenija. 2011. № 5 (105). P. 96–102. (In Russian)
6. Meleshnikov A.A. Rol' interpretacii i ocenki fizicheskogo oblika pri obshhenii na sajtah znakomstv. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N.A. Nekrasova. Serija: Pedagogika. Psihologija. Social'naja rabota. Juvenologija. Sociokinetika 2009. V. 15. № 4. P. 166–170. (In Russian)
7. Mironova Ju.G. Al'ternativnaja forma matrimonial'nogo povedenija: internet-znakomstva. Vestnik Samarskogo municipal'nogo instituta upravlenija. 2016. № 2. P. 157–164. (In Russian)
8. Mironova Ju.G., Tyrnova N.A. Internet-znakomstva kak forma brachnogo vybora sovremennoj molodezhi: sociologicheskij analiz. Sociologija. 2017. № 4. P. 32–35. (In Russian)
9. Pankratova L.S. Jeticheskie problemy i politika regulirovanija vnedrenija tehnologij iskusstvennogo intellekta v servisy onlajn znakomstv. Azimut nauchnyh issledovanij: jekonomika i upravlenie. 2019. V. 8. № 4 (29). P. 47–50. (In Russian)
10. Pipija K. “Nevidimoe men'shinstvo”: k probleme gomofobii v Rossii. Levada-centr . URL: https:/www.levada.ru/2015/05/05/nevidimoe-menshinstvo-k-probleme-gomofobii-v-rossii/ (data obrashhenija 09.10.2022). (In Russian)
11. Rossijane v pandemiju stali bol'she tratit' na onlajn-znakomstva. RIA Novosti. 31.10.2021. URL: https:/ria.ru/20211031/onlayn-znakomstva-1757059955.html (data obrashhenija 30.11.2021). (In Russian)
12. Tolkachev D.S. Osobennosti issledovanij seksual'noj orientacii: demograficheskie harakteristiki rossijskih gomoseksualov. Demograficheskoe obozrenie. 2021. V. 8. № 3. P. 74–95. (In Russian)
13. Urusova E.A., Husjainov T.M. Nesluchajnye vstrechi: kak tehnologizirujutsja znakomstva i otnoshenija v uslovijah obshhestva postmoderna. Logos et Rraxis. 2018. V. 17. № 4. P. 31–40. (In Russian)
14. Shmidt D.A., Vorob'eva A.E. Tipy rossijskih pol'zovatelej servisov internet-znakomstv: motivacija i lichnostnye cherty. Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Organizacionnaja psihologija i psihologija truda. 2022. V. 7. № 2. P. 119–139. (In Russian)
15. Ansari A. Modern Romance. London: Allen Lane, 2015.
16. Ayers C. Tinder: The app that’s setting the dating scene on fire. 2014. URL: http:/www.theaustralian.com.au/life/weekend-australian-magazine/tinder-the-app-thatssetting-the-dating-scene-on-fire/story-e6frg8h6-1226933263450 (дата обращения 21.09.2015).
17. Bauman Z. Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds. Cambridge: Polity, 2003.
18. Blackhart G.C., Fitzpatrick J., Williamson J. Dispositional factors predicting use of online dating sites and behaviors related to online dating. Computers in Human Behavior. 2014. № 33. P. 113–118.
19. Blackwell C., Birnholz J., Abbott C. Seeing and Being Seen: Co-situation and Impression Formation using Grindr, a Location-aware Gay Dating App. New Media & Society. 2015. V. 7. № 17. P. 1117–1136.
20. Botnen E.O., Bendixen M., Grøntvedt T.V., Kennair L.E.O. Individual differences in sociosexuality predict picture-based mobile dating app use. Personality and Individual Differences. 2018. № 131. P. 67–73.
21. Chan L.S. Who uses dating apps? Exploring the relationships among trust, sensation-seeking, smartphone use, and the intent to use dating apps based on the integrative model. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017. № 72. P. 246–258.
22. Ellison N.B., Hancock J.T., Toma C.L. Profile as promise: A framework for conceptualizing veracity in online dating self-presentations. New Media and Society. 2012. № 14. P. 45–62.
23. Freier A. Tinder mobile app statistics and revenue. 2015. URL: http:/www.businessofapps.com/tinder-mobile-app-statistics-and-revenue/ (дата обращения 22.09.2015)
24. Gatter K., Hodkinson K. On the differences between Tinder versus online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study. Cogent Psychology. 2016. V. 1. № 3.
25. Gudeluna D. There’s an app for that: The uses and gratifications of online social networks for gay men. Sexuality & Culture. 2012. V. 4. № 16. P. 347–365.
26. Hall J.A., Park N., Song H., Cody M.J. Strategic misrepresentation in online dating: The effects of gender, self-monitoring, and personality traits/ Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2010. №27. P. 117–135.
27. Jankowiak W., et al. Teasing with Sex, Hunting for a Relationship: What a Popular Adult Dating/Sex Site Can Tell Us About 21st Century USA Female Sexual Behavior. URL: https:/www.binghamton.edu/evos/evos/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Teasing-with-Sex.pdf (дата обращения 14.11.2020)
28. Korchmaros J.D., Ybarra M.L., Mitchell K.J. Adolescent online romantic relationship initiation: differences by sexual and gender identification. Journal of Adolescence. 2015. № 40. P. 54–64.
29. Lutz C., Ranzini G. Where Dating Meets Data: Investigating Social and Institutional Privacy Concerns on Tinder. Social Media + Society. 2017. V. 3. № 1.
30. Orosz G., et al. The personality, motivational, and need-based background of problematic Tinder use. Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 2018. № 7. P. 301–316.
31. Race K. Speculative Pragmatism and Intimate Arrangements: Online Hook-up Devices in Gay Life/ Culture, Health and Sexuality. 2015. V. 4. № 17. P. 496–511.
32. Rosenfeld M.J., Thomas R.J. Searching for a Mate: The Rise of the Internet as a Social Intermediary. American Sociological Review. 2012. V. 4. № 77. P. 523–547.
33. Sales N.J. Tinder and the dawn of the “Dating apocalypse”. URL: http:/www.vanityfair.com/culture/2015/08/tinder-hook-up-culture-end-of-dating (дата обращения 30.08.2022)
34. Stevens S.B., Morris T.L. College dating and social anxiety: using the Internet as a means of connecting to others. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2007. V. 5. № 10. P. 680–688.
35. Sumter S., Vandenbosch L., Ligtenberg L. Love me Tinder: Untangling emerging adults’ motivations for using the dating application Tinder. Telematics and Informatics. 2016. V. 1. №34. P. 67–78.
36. Sumter S.R., Vandenbosch L. Dating gone mobile: Demographic and personality-based correlates of using smartphone-based dating applications among emerging adults. New media & Society. 2019. V. 3. № 21. P. 655–673.
37. Timmermans E., De Caluwé E. Development and Validation of the Tinder Motives Scale (TMS). Computers in Human Behavior. 2017. № 70. P. 341–350.
38. Toma C.L., Hancock J.T. Looks and lies: The role of physical attractiveness in online dating self-presentation and deception. Communication Research. 2010. № 37. P. 335–351.
39. Toma C.L., Hancock J.T. What lies beneath: The linguistic traces of deception in online dating profiles. Journal of Communication. 2012. №62. P. 78–97.
40. Toma C.L., Hancock J.T., Ellison N.B. Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2008. № 34. P. 1023–1036.
41. Valkenburg P.M., Peter J. Who visits online dating sites? Exploring some characteristics of online daters. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2007. V. 6. № 10. P. 849–852.
42. Van De Wiele C., Tong S.T. Breaking boundaries: The uses & gratifications of grindr. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 2014. P. 619–630.
Comments
No posts found