1. Butovskaya M.L. Antropologiya pola. Fryazino: Vek 2, 2013. (in Russian)
2. Butovskaya M.L., Mezenceva A.A. Obobshchennye portrety muzhchin masaev: vneshnyaya privlekatel'nost' i fizicheskaya sila po ocenkam ekspertov toj zhe populyacii. Lico cheloveka: poznanie, obshchenie, deyatel'nost', 2019. P. 497–505. (in Russian)
3. Lokk K.E. Komp'yuternye metody summirovaniya izobrazhenij. Obobshchennyj i usrednennyj portrety. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 23: Antropologiya, 2011. № 1. P. 37–44. (in Russian)
4. Berry D.S., Brownlow S. Were the physiognomists right? Personality correlates of facial babyishness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1989. Vol. 15. № 2. P. 266–279.
5. Bovet J., Barkat-Defradas M., Durand V., Faurie C., Raymond M. Women's attractiveness is linked to expected age at menopause. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2018. Vol. 31. № 2. P. 229–238.
6. Bowers R.I., Place S.S., Todd P.M., Penke L., Asendorpf J.B. Generalization in mate-choice copying in humans. Behavioral Ecology. 2012. Vol. 23. №. 1. P. 112–124.
7. Buss D.M., Schmitt D.P. Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological review, 1993. Vol. 100. № 2. P. 204–232.
8. Butovskaya M.L., Windhager S., Karelin D., Mezentseva A., Shaefer K., Fink B. Associations of physical strength with facial shape in an African pastoralist society, the Maasai of Northern Tanzania. Plos one. 2018. Vol. 13. № 5. e0197738.
9. Cunningham M.R. Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1986. Vol. 50. № 5. P. 925–935.
10. Cunningham M.R., Barbee A.P., Pike C.L. What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1990. Vol. 59. № 1. P. 61–72.
11. DeBruine L.M., Jones B.C., Crawford J.R., Welling L.L.M., Little A.C. The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: cross-cultural variation in women's preferences for masculinized male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2010. Vol. 277. № 1692. P. 2405–2410.
12. Docherty C., Lee A.J., Hahn A.C., DeBruine L.M., Jones B.C. Do more attractive women show stronger preferences for male facial masculinity?. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2020. Vol. 41. № 4. P. 312–317.
13. Enlow D.H., Hans M.G. Essentials of facial growth. WB Saunders Company, 1996.
14. Eva K.W., Wood T.J. Are all the taken men good? An indirect examination of mate-choice copying in humans. Cmaj. 2006. Vol. 175. № 12. P. 1573–1574.
15. Fink B., Grammer K., Mitteroecker P., Gunz P., Schaefer K., Bookstein F.L., Manning J.T. Second to fourth digit ratio and face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2005. Vol. 272. № 1576. P. 1995–2001.
16. Fink B., Penton-Voak I. Evolutionary psychology of facial attractiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2002. Vol. 11. № 5. P. 154–158.
17. Folstad I., Karter A.J. Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. The American Naturalist. 1992. Vol. 139. № 3. P. 603–622.
18. Hamilton W.D., Zuk M. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science. 1982. Vol. 218. № 4570. P. 384–387.
19. Han C. Facial appearance as a cue of physical condition. Doctoral dissertation, University of Glasgow, 2018.
20. Hill S.E., Buss D.M. The mere presence of opposite-sex others on judgments of sexual and romantic desirability: Opposite effects for men and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2008. Vol. 34. № 5. P. 635–647.
21. Hone L.S.E., McCullough M.E. 2D: 4D ratios predict handgrip strength (but not hand grip endurance) in men (but not in women). Evolution and Human Behavior. 2012. Vol. 33. № 6. P. 780–789.
22. Hönekopp J., Manning J.T., Müller C. Digit ratio (2D: 4D) and physical fitness in males and females: Evidence for effects of prenatal androgens on sexually selected traits. Hormones and Behavior, 2006. Vol. 49. № 4. P. 545–549.
23. Jones B.C., DeBruine L.M., Little A.C., Burriss R.P., Feinberg D.R. Social transmission of face preferences among humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2007. Vol. 274. № 1611. P. 899–903.
24. Jones B.C., Little A.C., Boothroyd L., DeBruine L.M., Feinberg D.R., LawSmith M.J., Cornwell R.E., Moore F.R., Perrett D.I. Commitment to relationships and preferences for femininity and apparent health in faces are strongest on days of the menstrual cycle when progesterone level is high. Hormones and behaviour. 2005. Vol. 48. № 3. P. 283–290.
25. Lee A.J., Mitchem, D.G., Wright M.J., Martin N.G., Keller M.C., Zietsch B.P. Genetic factors that increase male facial masculinity decrease facial attractiveness of female relatives. Psychological Science. 2014. Vol. 25. № 2. P. 476–484.
26. Little A.C., Burriss R.P., Jones B.C., DeBruine L.M., Caldwell C.A. Social influence in human face preference: men and women are influenced more for long-term than short-term attractiveness decisions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 2008. Vol. 29. № 2. P. 140–146.
27. Little A.C., Burt D.M., Penton-Voak I.S., Perrett D.I. Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 2001. Vol. 268. № 1462. P. 39-44.
28. Little A.C., Hancock P.J. The role of masculinity and distinctiveness on the perception of attractiveness in human male faces. British Journal of Psychology. 2002. Vol. 93. № 4. P. 451–464.
29. Manning J., Kilduff L., Cook C., Crewther B., Fink B. Digit ratio (2D: 4D): a biomarker for prenatal sex steroids and adult sex steroids in challenge situations. Frontiers in endocrinology. 2014. Vol. 5. P. 9.
30. Marcinkowska U.M., Rantala M.J., Lee A.J., Kozlov M.V., Aavik T., Cai H., ... Dixson B.J. Women’s preferences for men’s facial masculinity are strongest under favorable ecological conditions// Scientific Reports, 2019. Vol. 9. №1. P. 1–10.
31. Meindl K., Windhager S., Wallner B., Shaefer K. Second-to-fourth digit ratio and facial shape in boys: the lower the digit ratio, the more robust the face. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2012. Vol. 279. № 1737. P. 2457–2463.
32. Mitteroecker P., Windhager S., Müller G.B., Schaefer K. The morphometrics of “masculinity” in human faces. PLoS One, 2015.Vol. 10. № 2. P. e0118374.
33. Nowak-Kornicka J., Borkowska B., Pawłowski B. Masculinity and immune system efficacy in men. Plos one, 2020, Vol. 15. №12. e0243777.
34. Penton-Voak I.S., Little A.C., Jones B.C., Burt D.M., Tiddeman B.P., Perrett D.I. Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology. 2003. Vol. 117. № 3. P. 264.
35. Perrett D.I., Lee K.J., Penton-Voak I.S., Rowland D.R., Yoshikawa S., Burt D.M., Henzi S.P., Castles D.L., Akamatsu S. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature. 1998. Vol. 398. № 6696. P. 884–887.
36. Rhodes G., Chan J., Zebrowitz L.A., Simmons L.W. Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health?. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 2003. Vol. 9. P. S93–S95.
37. Ribeiro E., Neave N., Morais R.N., Kilduff L., Taylor S.R., Butovskaya M., Manning J.T. Digit ratio (2D: 4D), testosterone, cortisol, aggression, personality and hand-grip strength: Evidence for prenatal effects on strength. Early human development, 2016. Vol. 98. P. 21–25.
38. Roosenboom J., Indencleef K., Lee M.K., Hoskens H., White J.D., Liu D., ... Weinberg S.M. SNPs associated with testosterone levels influence human facial morphology. Frontiers in genetics. 2018. Vol. 9: 497.
39. Senior C., Barnes J., Jenkins R., Landau S., Phillips M.L., David A.S., Senior C. Attribution of social dominance and maleness to schematic faces. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 1999. Vol. 27. № 4. P. 331–337.
40. Thornhill R., Grammer K. The body and face of woman: One ornament that signals quality?. Evolution and Human Behavior, 1999. Vol. 20. № 2. P. 105–120.
41. Windhager S., Bookstein F.L., Grammer K., Oberzaucher E., Said H., Slice D.E., Thorstensen T., Schaefer K. “Cars have their own faces”: cross-cultural ratings of car shapes in biological (stereotypical) terms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 2012. Vol.33. № 2. P. 109–120.
42. Windhager S., Schaefer K., Fink B. Geometric morphometrics of male facial shape in relation to physical strength and perceived attractiveness, dominance, and masculinity. American Journal of Human Biology, 2011. Vol. 23. № 6. P. 805–814.
Comments
No posts found