1. Kalita V.V., Gajdaj A.S. Relevantnost' psihologicheskogo portreta kak determinanta effekta Barnuma. Vestnik KemGU. 2018. №1 (73). P. 133–138. (in Russian)
2. Naumenko A.S. Vlijanie formy testovyh interpretacij na prinjatie reshenij specialistami po podboru personala. Psihologija. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki. 2007. № 3 (4). P. 127−140. (in Russian)
3. Panteleev A.F. Problema dostovernosti rezul'tatov social'no-psihologicheskogo issledovanija. Izvestija Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaja serija. Serija: Filosofija. Psihologija. Pedagogika. 2019. № 2 (19). P. 176−182. (in Russian)
4. Sevost'janov O.V. Medicinskij okkul'tizm: rasprostranennost' i vlijanie na klinicheskuju psihiatricheskuju praktiku. Nauchnye rezul'taty biomedicinskih issledovanij. 2020. № 2 (6). P. 273−288. (in Russian)
5. Sugonjaev K.V. Mozhno li ocenit' lichnostnye harakteristiki s pomoshh'ju testa Ljushera?. Psihologija. Psihofiziologija. 2019. № 2 (12). P. 41−59. (in Russian)
6. Bachrach A.K., Pattishall E.G. An experiment inuniversal, personal validation. Psychiatry. 1960. № 23. P. 267–270.
7. Baucom D.H., Greene R.L. The universality of generalized personality statements. Journ. of Personality Assessment. 1979. № 43. P. 497–500.
8. Carrier N.A. Need correlates of “gullibility”. Journ. of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1963. № 66. P. 84–86.
9. Claridge G., Clark K., Powney E., Hassan E. Schizotypy and the Barnum Effect. Personality, Individual Differences. 2008. № 44(2). P. 436–444.
10. Collins R.W., Dmitruk V.M., Ranney J.J. Personal validation: Some empirical, ethical considerations. Journ. of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1977. № 45. P. 70–77.
11. Dmitruk V.M., Collins R.W., Clinger D.I. The “Barnum Effect”, acceptance of negative personal evaluation. Journ. of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1973. № 41. P. 192–194.
12. Forer B.R. The fallacy of personal validation: A classroom demonstration of gullibility. Journ. of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1949. № 44. P. 118–123.
13. Greene R.L. Student acceptance of generalized personality interpretations: A reexamination. Journ. of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1977. № 45. P. 965.
14. Greene R.L. Can clients provide valuable feedback to clinicians about their personality interpretations? Greene replies. Journ. of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1978. № 46. P. 1496–1497.
15. Greene, R.L., Harris, M.E., & Macon, R.S. Another look at personal validation. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1979. № 43(4). P. 419–423.
16. Halperin K., Snyder C., Shenkel R., Houston B. Effects of source status, message favorability on acceptance of personality feedback. Journ. of Applied Psychology. 1976. № 61. P. 85–88.
17. Lattal K.A., Lattal A.D. Students' “gullibility”: A systematic replication. Journ. of Psychology, 67. 1967. P. 319–322.
18. Layne C. Relationship between the Barnum Effect, personality inventory responses. Journ. of Clinical Psychology. 1978. № 34. P. 94-97.
19. Layne C. The Barnum Effect: Rationality versus gullibility. Journ. of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1979. № 47. P. 219–221.
20. Layne C., Ally G. How and why people accept personality feedback. Journ. of Personality Assessment. 1980. № 44. P. 541–546.
21. Layne C., Michels P.Y. Inventory responding as a model of people's acceptance of personality interpretations. Journ. of Personality Assessment. 1979. № 43. P. 509–513.
22. Manning E.J. “Personal validation”: Replication of Forer's study. Psychological Reports. 1968. № 23. P. 181-182.
23. Marks D., Kammann R. The psychology of the “psychic”. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus, 1980.
24. Merrens M.R., Richards W.S. Acceptance of generalized versus bona fide personality interpretations. Psychological Reports. 1970. № 27. P. 691–694.
25. Mosher D.L. Approval motive, acceptance of “fake” personality test interpretations which differ in favorability. Psychological Reports. 1965. № 17. P. 395–402.
26. Mason O.J., Budge K. Schizotypy, self-referential thinking, the Barnum effect. Journ. of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry. 2011. V.42. № 2. P. 145–148.
27. Orpen R.B., Jamotte A. The acceptance of generalized personality interpretations. Journ. of Social Psychology. 1975. № 96. P. 147–148.
28. Rosen G.M. Effects of source prestige on subjects' acceptance of the Barnum Effect: Psychologist versus astrologer. Journ. of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1975. № 43. P. 95.
29. Snyder C.R., Clair M.S. Does insecurity breed acceptance? Effects of trait, situational insecurity on acceptance of positive, negative diagnostic feedback. Journ. of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1977. № 45. P. 843–850.
30. Snyder C.R., Shenkel R.J. Effects of favorability, modality, relevance upon acceptance of general personality interpretations prior to, after receiving diagnostic feedback. Journ. of Consulting, Clinical Psychology. 1976. № 44. P. 34–41.
31. Ulrich, R. E., Stachnik, T. J., & Stainton, N. R. Student acceptance of generalized personality interpretations. Psychological Reports. 1963. № 13(3). P. 831–834.
32. Weisberg P. Student acceptance of bogus personality interpretations differing in level of social desirability. Psychological Reports. 1970. № 27. P. 743–746.
Comments
No posts found